Verified Voting Logo
Edit Your PreferencesContact VerifiedVoting.orgAbout VerifiedVoting.org
Verified Voting HomeJoin - Help us do this work!Donate - Help us do this work!Take Action Today!Endorse the resolution!
Printer Friendly Version

See information for:

The Verified Voting Foundation engages in educational activities permitted by IRC Section 501(c)(3). Please visit VerifiedVoting.org for info about 501(c)(4) lobbying activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation. Also, check out our blog and twitter feed.

E-Mail This Page

Home   »  Miscellaneous  »  Dec 30, 2003


Dec 30, 2003

January 13th, 2004

Democrats air concern on vote fraud

By Anthony Man
Staff writer
Posted December 30 2003

Boca raton · Critics warned Monday that computer error or outright fraud easily could alter the outcome of
elections conducted on Palm Beach County's electronic voting machines.

Vincent J. Lipsio, a software design engineer from Gainesville, said he was not a "conspiracy theorist," but expressed concern about the voting equipment put in use in the aftermath of the 2000 presidential election.

For example, he said, it would be easy for a beginning computer science student to rig the devices so that 57 percent of all votes next fall go to President Bush regardless of who the voters actually .

"There's a lot of history in American politics of ballot box stuffing," he said. "A few deft keystrokes and all the ballot boxes in a county get stuffed at once."

Lipsio, who volunteers to work on voting issues for the Institute of Electrical & Electronic Engineers, said there are so many potential problems with the computer voting equipment "we will have no way of knowing how the election really went."

U.S. Rep. Robert Wexler, D-Boca Raton, appeared with Lipsio before 200 people at a Democratic event, the Committee to Defeat Bush gathering at Florida Atlantic University.

"I'm not a paranoid person," Wexler said. "I don't operate from a paranoid point of view." But, he said, the potential for problems is great. "Both a purposeful attack on the computer system or just a computer malfunction will put our whole democratic process in chaos," he said.

County Supervisor of Elections Theresa LePore said their analysis was deeply flawed. "It's just a bunch of lies," she said. LePore said it would be impossible to rig the machines.

Someone would have to break into a secure warehouse and tamper individually with 5,000 machines because they aren't connected. They have no modems, so a hacker could not meddle with them remotely.

LePore said there are extensive safeguards to ensure the accuracy of votes cast on the electronic machines. They are recorded in three places, and a diagnostic test is performed after each voter uses the machine.

What's more, she added, there is so much testing of the machines and software, starting before the state certifies them through public tests before each election, that any problems would be detected.

Wexler said a simple solution would eliminate doubt.

He wants all voting machines retrofitted so that a paper printout spits out each time an electronic vote is cast. That would allow voters to check the accuracy of the machines and provide a backup that could be used if a recount is necessary.

LePore said that's not a simple fix. "It's not as easy as they think where you go to Office Depot and buy a printer off the shelf."

Equipment and software compatible with the voting machines has to be developed, go through testing and get state certification.

If that ultimately happens, she said, it might cost $600 to $1,000 for each of Palm Beach County's 5,000 voting machines. That's $3 million to $5 million.

And, she said, paper printouts would create all sorts of problems. If they had to be counted, it would be a
messy process with 500,000 pieces of paper.

"You're injecting humans in the process again, just like they did with the punch cards," she said.

The decision is up to the state. No one from the Secretary of State's Office, which oversees elections, could be reached for comment Monday afternoon.

Ruth Pleva, chairwoman of The Committee to Defeat Bush, is among the Democrats who think Bush and the Republicans stole the 2000 election.

"They would like to steal it once more using the corruptible electronic voting machines," said Pleva, who lives west of Delray Beach.

LePore has become a lightning rod for Democrats since the recount that followed the 2000 presidential elections. Some party members think her strict interpretation of election law helped Bush over Democrat Al Gore in the recount process.

Pleva didn't invite LePore. "I don't have enemies at my parties," she said.

Lipsio, a Democratic activist in his home community, and Wexler, a sharp critic of President Bush, clearly
have partisan interests.

And the crowd was primed to hear about potential problems with the 2004 voting. When a brief videotape was shown early in the meeting, former Secretary of State Katherine Harris instrumental in the pro-Bush resolution of the 2000 election appeared on the screen twice.

Both times her image was greeted with a chorus of boos.

Anthony Man can be reached at aman@sun-sentinel.com or 561-832-2905.

Copyright © 2003, South Florida Sun-Sentinel

Announcements

August 26, 2010
On India’s Electronic Voting Controversy
August 25, 2010
Pac-Man for president: Hack highlights e-voting flaws
August 6, 2010
Voting Technology Research Gets In-Depth
July 27, 2010
State Election Officials: Recountable Process A Must for Overseas Voters
July 20, 2010
Online Voting: All That Glitters Is Not Gold (Unless You're a Vendor)
June 21, 2010
Voting Without A Net In South Carolina
June 17, 2010
Voting results in New Jersey should not be mysterious
June 16, 2010
Verified Voting Calls for Recountable, Auditable Voting Systems Following South Carolina Primary
June 16, 2010
Voting integrity groups call for investigation of South Carolina voting systems in wake of unexpected primary results in Democratic US Senate race
June 15, 2010
On the South Carolina Primary
May 23, 2010
Benefits, risks of e-mail ballots weighed
May 4, 2010
PA - Team 4: Security Concerns About Voting Machines Remain
April 26, 2010
California Assembly committee endorses UC Berkeley statistician's election auditing method
March 8, 2010
Feds Move to Break Voting-Machine Monopoly
March 2, 2010
Is the Internet the Right Place for Our Ballots? Election Administration and Voting Rights Thought Leaders Weigh in on the Future of Overseas Voting at Summit 2010
February 25, 2010
Minnesota Civic Groups Refute Recount Claims
February 17, 2010
Groups and Election Officials Warn Department of Justice that Voting Machine Vendor Merger will Inflate Costs to Taxpayers, Threaten Election Accuracy and National Security
February 11, 2010
Fla. justices uphold local election law
February 3, 2010
NJ Judge Issues Mixed Order on Use of E-voting Machines
February 1, 2010
Ruling Issued in Rutgers–Newark Law School’s Constitutional Litigation Clinic Challenge to NJ's Electronic Voting Machines

Get E-Mail Alerts




Important Links

  • VVBlog: Check out the latest news and commentary at our blog.
  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project


  • "The core of our American democracy is the right to vote. Implicit in that right is the notion that that vote be private, that vote be secure, and that vote be counted as it was intended when it was cast by the voter. And I think what we're encountering is a pivotal moment in our democracy where all of that is being called into question." (more here)

    Kevin Shelley, former
    California Sec. of State





    Verified Voting Foundation, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.

    © Copyright 2008, Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.


    Privacy    Site Map